- What if we don’t use the Social Change Model of Leadership Development on campus? Is participation still valuable?
- What if we don’t have a formalized leadership program? Is participation still valuable?
- Can we add more cases to our sample size for the survey?
- How much work is participation for the school?
- Is there a longitudinal option?
- Do all schools need to obtain IRB approval? What if our school doesn’t have an IRB?
- Can I view a copy of the full survey?
- Can we set the dates students receive the email invitations to participate?
- Who will have access to our data?
- Are there issues involved in sharing student email addresses for the study? Wouldn’t that be a violation of student privacy? Can I participate without providing email addresses?
- When is the last date I can enroll in the study?
Yes. Many of the institutions that participate in MSL do not use SCM directly and still find participation in the study incredibly useful. Our research demonstrates that although the SCM represents a unique approach to leadership development, it is also more similar than different when compared to other contemporary theories such as relational leadership, servant leadership, authentic leadership, and transformational leadership. We are happy to share insights on how to use MSL data as a means to examine these other orientations toward leadership development. Furthermore, the MSL measures many leadership-related outcomes (e.g., leadership efficacy, resiliency) that transcend any one particular model.
Yes. Student leadership capacities are developed in a variety of contexts; from residence halls and athletic groups to academic advising and student employment experiences.
In fact, scholars of leadership development believe that everyone in the college environment is responsible for helping students become leaders. Not just the educators involved with dedicated leadership programs.
You may use your MSL findings educate all faculty and staff about student leadership development, and to create evidence-based guidelines for all personnel interacting with students.
Yes. The recommended sample size can be increased for an additional cost. For additional information, please contact Scott Crawford, MSL Project Director at Survey Sciences Group.
MSL was designed to expedite and streamline your role. You are not responsible for administering, collecting, and returning survey instruments. We also provide comprehensive respondent support, a customized sample management system, and daily response–rate monitoring during data collection.
Your role is to prepare for MSL on your campus —such as securing IRB approval, selecting a sample, and customizing e–mail templates for corresponding with students. We will assign a dedicated School Coordinator to walk you through this process.
The total work load will depend on your institutional policies. It will also depend upon whether you choose to customize MSL with custom questions, a comparative sample, and a comprehensive incentive plan.
MSL is offered as a cross–sectional study only. A longitudinal version is under development.
In order to comply with increasingly complex and stringent regulations regarding research using human subjects, MSL will be authorized by a “master” national IRB approved through Loyola University Chicago. We also require each participant to obtain local IRB approval.
Your School Coordinator will provide templates and other information to expedite the process of obtaining local IRB approval and reduce the workload. In some cases, local IRBs will expedite or waive the approval process when presented with proof of national IRB review.
If your institution does not have an IRB, you will be asked to submit written approval for participation in the MSL from a senior administrator authorized to approve such studies.
MSL is copyrighted. So we can’t release the full questionnaire until you have completed the registration processes. But information about the instrument is available here. You may also review the national report from the first MSL. It provides detailed information about the instrument and variables of interest.
We will work directly with you to determine a three–week window for data collection. This date should not overlap with the first full two weeks of your spring term, spring breaks, or mid–term testing periods.
The MSL Research Team and the Center for Student Studies will prepare your data for the final report. Data will also be aggregated into a national dataset for the purposes of analysis. At no point will institutional data be shared with anyone outside the research team in a way that identifies a particular school.
That depends on your institution. Each college or university has a unique policy about distributing student contact information.
Under federal law, it is NOT a violation of FERPA to share student email addresses for MSL, since your school is contracting with the Survey Sciences Group. You are sharing information to enhance your educational practice.
We are happy to speak with institutional representative about this and can share the significant privacy measures we have in place to protect respondent confidentiality.
Unfortunately, we can’t accommodate institutions that aren’t permitted to share their student’s e–mail addresses.
We encourage campuses to sign up as early as possible for the MSL so that they have the benefit of time to prepare for the study. Additionally, as the study fills up, we may reach a point where we have to limit schools that enroll so we can ensure we have enough staff to accommodate all enrolled schools, so again we encourage schools to sign up as early as possible. As long as the enrollment form is active you may enroll in the study.